Project Cl@ssi 2.0. The first step towards School 2.0
Abstract
The following article aims at describing the main features of the “Cl@ssi 2.0” project, which was carried out in Italy by the Ministry of Education (MIUR). The project is embedded in a larger action plan launched in 2009: the National Plan for the Digital School. The main aim of the Plan is to integrate ICT into the daily activities of a school. The article analyses two main aspects of the project: the modification of the learning environment due to ICT integration and teacher training based on a coaching model provided by a network of universities and by the National Agency for the Support of School Autonomy (ANSAS, now known as Indire).
Keywords
Learning environment, motivation, collaborative learning, teacher trainingReferences
ANDERSON T. E ELLOUMI F. (a cura di), 2004, Theory and Practice of Online Learning, Athabasca University, in http://cde.athabascau.ca/online_book/ [consultado el 31/05/2012]
BEAUCHAMP, G., & PARKINSON, J. (2005). « Beyond the ‘wow’ factor: developing interactivity with the interactive whiteboard”. School Science Review, 86, 97-103.
BERTIN, G. (1994), Un modello di valutazione basato sul giudizio degli esperti, in Bezzi C. - Scettri M. (a cura di), La valutazione come ricerca e come intervento, supplemento al n. 14-15 di “Sociologia e professione”.
BIONDI, G. (2008), LIM. A scuola con la Lavagna Interattiva Multimediale. Firenze: Giunti Editore.
BRONFENBRENNER, U. (1979) The Ecology of Human Development, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press
CORRAO S. (1999), Il focus group: una tecnica di rilevazione da ri-scoprire, in “Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale”, XX, 60, pp. 94-106.
CIOLFI, L. & BANNON, L. (2003). Understanding “place” for enhancing the design of interactive environments. Technical Report UL IDC 11-05-04. Disponibile alla pagina http://www.idc.ul.ie/publications [consultado el 31/05/2012]
CUREE, Center for the Use and Research & Evidence in Education. (2005).
National Framework for Mentoring and Coaching
URL: http://www.curee-paccts.com/mentoring-and-coaching
[consultado el 31/05/2012]
CHASTAIN, T. R. (1999). “Forming place, Informing practice. Places”, 12 (3), pp. 6-9.
CREMIT(2008), Centro di Ricerca sull’Educazione ai Media, all’Informazione e alla Tecnologia a cura di Rivoltella PC, Ferrari S., Sinini G. Monitoraggio finale del progetto DiGiscuola http://www.indire.it/db/docsrv/PDF/report_rivoltella/report_DG_luglio08_Def.pdf e
http://www.cremit.it/public/documenti/Pubblicazioni/Atti%20di%20convegni/convegno%20LIm_marzo2009/Microsoft%20Word%20-%20Abstract_Sinini.pdf [consultado el 31/05/2012]
DEDE C. (2005), Planning for Neomillennial Learning Styles. In EDUCAUSE Quartely 28 N.1. http://www.educause.edu/pub/eq/eqm05/eqm0511.asp [consultado el 31/05/2012]
GENNARI, M., Pedagogia degli ambienti educativi, Armando 1997.
GLOVER, D., & MILLER, D. (2002). “Running with technology: the pedagogic impact of the large scale introduction of interactive whiteboards”. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10 (3), 257-267.
HARRISON, S., DOURISH, P. (1996). “Re-place-ing space: The roles of space and place in collaborative systems”. Proceedings of CSCW 96. ACM, New York, NY, pp. 67-76.
KRUEGER, R.A. (1994), Focus groups. A pratical Guide for Applied Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
MONONEN-AALTONEN, M. A (2006) LEARNING ENVIRONMENT “A Euphemism for Instruction or a Potential for Dialogue” In Media Education Publication 8.
OECD, (2009) Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) http://www.oecd.org/document/0/0,3746,en_2649_39263231_38052160_1_1_1_1,00.html.
Parigi L., Interfaccia a misura di scuola, La Lavagna Interattiva Multimediale nella percezione degli insegnanti», Didamatica, Atti del Convegno, 2009, http://services.economia.unitn.it/didamatica2009/Atti/lavori/parigi.pdf [consultado el 31/05/2012]
PAINTER, D, WHITING, E., & WOLTERS, B. (2005). “The Use of an Interactive Whiteboard in Promoting Interactive Teaching and Learning”. VSTE Journal, 19 (2), 31-40.
PERRENOUD, P., (1999) “D’une métaphore à l’autre : transfér ou mobiliseur ses conossances” in DOLZ J. OLLANGNIER E. (eds) L’énigme de la compétence en education, numero monografico di Raisons éducatives 1999, n. ½ pp 61-73.
SCHÖN, D.A. (2006). Il professionista riflessivo. Per una nuova epistemologia della pratica professionale. Milano, Franco Angeli.
SMITH, H., HIGGINS, S., WALL, K., & MILLER, J. (2005). “Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature”. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21 (2), 91-101.
TUAN, Y.F. (1977). Space and place. The perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
Vuorikari R, Garoia V., Balanskat A., Report Introducing Netbook pedagogies in school. ACER - European Schoolnet Educational Netbook Pilot http://files.eun.org/netbooks/Acer_Netbook_Study.pdf
WENGER, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Published
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2013 Giuseppina Cannella
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
