Implementation of Dual Training Programmes through the Development of Boundary Objects: A Case Study
Abstract
A dual training system or programme tries to balance education (in a school) and training (in a company) in an equal manner to qualify, educate and socialise the next generation. Besides these effects (qualification, education and socialisation), it seems that this dual structure enables a country to achieve economic targets (e.g. economic growth) and social objectives (e.g. the integration of young people into the employment market), which is why attempts are being made in various countries to develop or to preserve dual training structures. This study focuses on emerging dual training programmes in the United States of America. Our questions are: How do German companies establish dual structures in the United States of America? How do they shape the cooperation between companies and schools? As the cooperation aspect will be the focus of the article, we will concentrate on the interface between the schools and the companies. Our theoretical reference is the concept of boundary objects; a concept within the tradition of cultural-historical activity theory. Using this concept, we show how and in which way dual training structures and an innovative workplace learning partnership have being established in a German transplant in the USA.Keywords
activity theory, boundary objects, vocational education and training, professional development, German dual system, case studyReferences
Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., & Turner, B. S. (1984). Dictionary of sociology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Akkermann, S. F. & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132-169.
Bakker, A. & Akkermann, S. F. (2014). A boundary-crossing approach to support students’ integration of statistical and work-related knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(2), 223-237.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. San Francisco: Chandler. Cohen, M. & Besharov, D. J. (2002). The role of career and technical education: Implications for the federal government. Washington: Office of Vocational and Adult Education. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED466939.pdf
DaimlerChrysler (1999). Mercedes-Benz Produktionssystem: Systembeschreibung. Stuttgart, Germany. Retrieved from http://engp-download.daimler.com/docmaster/en/doc/MPS_-_SYSTEMBESCHREIBUNG.2000-01-17.DE.pdf
Deutscher Ausschuss für das Erziehungs- und Bildungswesen (ed.). (1965). Empfehlungen und Gutachten 7/8: Gutachten über das Berufliche Ausbildungs- und Schulwesen, Bonn 10. Juli 1964. Stuttgart: Klett.
Eisenhardt, K. & Graebner, M. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
— (1999). Lernen durch Expansion. Marburg: BdWI.
— (2008). Entwickelnde Arbeitsforschung. Die Tätigkeitstheorie in der Praxis. Berlin: Lehmanns.
— (2009). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez (eds.). Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 303-328). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. & Kärkkäinen, M. (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction, 5(1), 319-336.
Engeström, Y. & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1-24.
Euler, D. (2013). Germany’s dual vocational training system: A model for other countries? Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
Flynn, M., Pillay, H. & Watters, J. (2015). Boundary crossing: A theoretical framework to understand the operational dynamics of industry-school partnerships. TVET@Asia, 5, 1-17. Retrieved from http://www.tvet-online.asia/issue5/flynn_etal_tvet5.pdf
Gal, U., Yoo, Y. & Boland Jr., R. (2005). The dynamics of boundary objects, social infrastructures and social identities (Paper 57). Paper presented at the ECIS 2005 Proceedings. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2005/57
Geithner, S. (2014). Arbeit als Tätigkeit. In J. Sydow, D. Sadowski & P. Conrad (eds.). Managementforschung 24 (pp. 1-32). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
Gessler, M. (2016). Educational transfer as transformation: A case study about the emergence and implementation of dual apprenticeship structures in a German automotive transplant in the United States. Vocations and Learning. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12186-016-9161-8
— (2017). Areas of Learning: The Shift Towards Work and Competence Orientation Within the School-based Vocational Education in the German Dual Apprenticeship System. In M. Mulder (ed.). Competence-Based Vocational and Professional Education. Bridging the World of Work and Education (pp. 695-717). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Gessler, M. & Freund, L. (eds.) (2015). Crossing Boundaries in Vocational Education and Training: Innovative Concepts for the 21st Century. Bremen: Institut Technik und Bildung.
Gessler, M. & Howe, F. (2013). The German dual vocational training system: The origin of the current architecture. Bulletin of Institute of Technology and Vocational Education, Nagoya University Japan, 10, 17-28.
— (2015). From the Reality of Work to Grounded Work-Based Learning in German Vocational Education and Training: Background, Concept and Tools. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2(3), 214-238.
Gonon, P. (2014). Development cooperation in the field of vocational education and training: The dual system as a global role model? In M. Maurer & P. Gonon (eds.). The challenges of policy transfer in vocational skill development (pp. 241-259). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
Haasen, A. (1999). M-Class: The making of a new Daimler-Benz. Organizational Dynamics, 27(4), 74-78.
Gomm, R., Hammersley, M. & Foster, P. (eds.) (2000). Case study method. London: Sage.
Hsieh, H.-F. & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
Kerosuo, H. (2006). Boundaries in action: An activity-theoretical study of development, learning and change in health care for patients with multiple and chronic illnesses. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
Kerosuo, H. & Toiviainen, H. (2011). Expansive learning across workplace boundaries. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 48-54.
Kimble, C., Grenier, C. & Goglio-Primard, K. (2010). Innovation and knowledge sharing across professional boundaries: Political interplay between boundary objects and brokers. International Journal of Information Management, 30, 437-444.
Lewis, T. (2007). The problem of cultural fit: What can we learn from borrowing the German dual system? Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 37(4), 463-477.
Lompscher, J. (2004). Lernkultur Kompetenzentwicklung aus kulturhistorischer Sicht. Lernen Erwachsener im Arbeitsprozess. Berlin: Lehmanns.
Meyer, J.-A. (2003). Die Fallstudie in der betriebswirtschaftlichen Forschung und Lehre. Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, 32(8), 475-479.
Oeltjenbruns, H. (2000). Organisation der Produktion nach dem Vorbild Toyota. Analyse, Vorteile und detaillierte Voraussetzungen sowie die Vorgehensweise zur erfolgreichen Einführung am Beispiel eines globalen Automobilkonzerns. Aachen, Germany: Shaker.
Okhuysen, G. A., Lepak, D., Ashcraft, K. L., Labiance, G., Smith, V. & Steensma, H. K. (2013). Theories of work and working today. Academy of Management Review, 38(4), 491-502.
Oswick, C. & Robertson, M. (2009). Boundary objects reconsidered: From bridges and anchors to barricades and mazes. Journal of Change Management 9, 179-194.
Passoth, J.-H. (2012). Dinge der Wissenschaft. In S. Maasen, M. Kaiser, M. Reinhard & B. Sutter (eds.). Handbuch Wissenschaftssoziologie (pp. 203-212). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
Placklé, I., Könings, K., Jacquet, W., Struyven, K., Libotton, A., Merriënboer, J. & Engels, N. (2014). Students’ preferred characteristics of learning environments in vocational secondary education. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 1(2), 107-124.
Prior, L. (2003). Using documents in social research. London: SAGE Publications.
Rowley, J. (2002). Using case studies in research. Management Research News, 25(1), 16- 27.
Rubinski, P. & Writer, S. (2010, November 14). Schaefer was key to bringing the C-Class to Vance. Tuscaloosa News. Retrieved from http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/article/20101114/NEWS/101119885/0/
Schaal, S. (2009). Arbeitstätigkeit in Organisationen: Betrachtung aus Sicht der Tätigkeitstheorie, der Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie und des boundary object. In K. P. Schulz & S. Geithner (eds.). Lerntätigkeit und Arbeitsgestaltung Nr. 01/2009 (pp. 1-54). Chemnitz: TU Chemnitz.
Star, S. L. & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420.
Stake, R. E. (1978). The case study method in social inquiry. Educational Researcher, 7(2), 5-8.
Tanggaard, L. (2007). Learning at trade vocational school and learning at work: boundary crossing in apprentices’ everyday life. Journal of Education and Work, 20(5), 453-466.
Trompette, P. & Vinck, D. (2009). Revisiting the notion of Boundary Object. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances, 3(1), 3-25.
Wortham, A. (2003, February 6). Merecedes-Benz announces West Alabama apprenticeship program. Tuscaloosa News. Retrieved from http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/article/20030206/NEWS/302060002/0/
Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O. (2005). Kooperation zwischen Ausbildungsinstitutionen und Lernorten in der beruflichen Bildung – eine multidisziplinäre Analyse. Bildungsforschung, 2(1), 1-26.
Published
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2017 Michael Gessler
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
